Written by W'Lawpsh   

You say it is to serve and protect?

But what?

And for whom?

Listen up, please, you in the white shirt and police cap smashing at people with a club for the misdemeanor allegedly of causing a disturbance by protesting against injustice, anxiety, war, inequality and servitude.

Does your Constitution not proclaim the intent of establishing justice, tranquility, defence, welfare and liberty by means of the commerce, defence and treaty clauses that together implement peace through respect for the sovereignty of foreign Nations and Indian tribes?

Does it not also declare your duty is “to support this Constitution” for “the People”?

Not just you, of course, but including you. Certainly it is the duty of each of the legislators who enacted the Appropriations Act of 1871 that treasonably implemented in place of the Constitution the conflicting federal policy of global empire enforced by war and genocide in abrogation of justice, tranquility, defence, welfare and liberty for all, in favor instead of more profit and power for the war mongers and money controllers of the military industrial complex. Just as it is equally is the duty of the President who, rather than refusing to perpetuate in the ongoing extermination of the Indian tribes under the Appropriations Act of 1871, instead prefers to add to the massed graves the additional casualties of fresh wars and genocides also against foreign Nations pursuant to the War Powers Act of 1973. But above all it is the duty of each Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. In each of them is invested the sacred trust of civilization: the rule of law. Theirs is duty to put a stop to those others’ dereliction by taking notice of the Indian tribes’ constitutional question of Indian tribal sovereignty, the judicial obstruction of which question is how the empire took over, and therefore how it must end. For there is not the remotest shadow of doubt that their and your dereliction of duty gives “Aid and Comfort to the Enemies” of the Constitution and the People and, for that reason, constitutes treason.

The fact that the Judges’ breach is the most heinous and unconscionable does not absolve any of the others however. Just following orders is not a defence to treason any more than to genocide. Of course, so long as everyone in power hangs together there will never be any need to have a defence. Dereliction of constitutional duty is grounds for professional advancement in this age of unconstitutional empire. So you can if you want get away with beating up the innocent in order better to serve and protect the guilty.

But why not try this instead? Put down your club. Ask your fellow officers to do the same. And with one voice ask the Supreme Court of the United States to relieve you of the unjust burden of the conflict between your constitutional duty and your superiors’ orders, by addressing the Indian tribes’ seminal constitutional question.